Legal Opinion

State v. King

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1994No. 93-1290PublishedCited by 187 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The principal query before us is whether a defendant’s oral waiver of speedy trial rights, which does not appear on the record, is effective. In the absence of such a waiver we also consider whether a trial court may sua sponte continue a defendant’s trial beyond the expiration of the time limit prescribed in R.C. 2945.71 for bringing a defendant to trial, without a journal entry explaining the reasons for the continuance. For the reasons that follow, we hold that a defendant’s waiver of his or her right to a speedy trial must be either written or made on the record in open court. We also…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. MincyOhio Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by187 opinions

  1. State v. RameyOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. BlackburnOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. MaysOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. HighOhio Court of Appeals · 2001

182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API