State v. King
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
The principal query before us is whether a defendant’s oral waiver of speedy trial rights, which does not appear on the record, is effective. In the absence of such a waiver we also consider whether a trial court may sua sponte continue a defendant’s trial beyond the expiration of the time limit prescribed in R.C. 2945.71 for bringing a defendant to trial, without a journal entry explaining the reasons for the continuance. For the reasons that follow, we hold that a defendant’s waiver of his or her right to a speedy trial must be either written or made on the record in open court. We also…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MincyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by187 opinions
- State v. RameyOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. BlackburnOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. MaysOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. HighOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.