Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Krogness v. Gladden

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 27, 1965No. Civ. 64-357PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAST, District Judge.

The relators seek federal habeas relief from the custody of the respondent, had pursuant to judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Union County.

The federal claim of unlawful conviction and sentence is that the relator’s conviction and sentence was based upon evidence (burglars’ tools, pistols and loot from a burglary) obtained through an unreasonable search and seizure by Washington State police officers and turned over to Oregon authorities. Of course, the evidence is no more valid in the hands of the Oregon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. KrognessOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Eduardo Amador-Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. United States v. Willie Robinson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. State v. O'NEALOregon Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API