Legal Opinion

State v. Krogness

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1963PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Robert Krogness, Neil Hart and Thomas Russell were convicted of a burglary committed in Pendleton, Oregon. They appeal.

The only question before this court is whether certain evidence was illegally seized. The questioned exhibits are burglars’ tools and the loot from the burglary. They were found in the automobile in which the three defendants were riding. The automobile was stopped for a traffic violation. The evidence was taken in a search which followed. Timely motion was made to suppress the evidence.

The state argues that the illegality, if any, of the seizure cannot be a ground for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. KalunaHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. ElkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1966

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API