Legal Opinion

Stueve Bros. Farms, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 2, 2012No. 11-799 LPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEWITT, Chief Judge.

This is an action for just compensation pursuant to the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. See infra Part I. Plaintiffs, the owners of land within the Prado Dam Flood Control Basin, allege that the government has effected a physical taking by subjecting their properties to a risk of flooding above the elevation allowed by the government’s flowage easements. See infra Part I. Because plaintiffs’ claims are premised on the “apprehension of future flooding” rather than on flooding that has actually occurred and which is…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stueve Bros. Farms, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Stueve Bros. Farms, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. In Re Upstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API