Legal Opinion

In Re Upstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 30, 2020No. 17-9001Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9001L (Filed: April 30, 2020) ********************************** ) IN RE UPSTREAM ADDICKS AND ) BARKER (TEXAS) FLOOD- ) CONTROL RESERVOIRS ) ) Date of taking of a permanent flowage ********************************** ) easement; scope of that easement THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: ) ) ALL UPSTREAM CASES ) ) ********************************** ) Daniel H. Charest and E. Lawrence Vincent, Burns Charest LLP, Dallas, Texas, Charles Irvine, Irvine & Conner PLLC, Houston, Texas, and Edwin Armistead Easterby, Williams Hart Boundas…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API