Stueve Bros. Farms, LLC v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
This takings case requires us to decide whether the government’s actions effected a physical taking of a flowage easement over the plaintiffs’ property, even though the government never occupied the property by flooding. The Court of Federal Claims held that the government’s conduct did not constitute a taking. We affirm.
I
In 1941, the United States Army Corps of Engineers completed construction of the Prado Dam on the Santa Ana River near Corona, California. Predecessors of plaintiffs Stueve Bros. Farms, LLC, and Mill-creek Farming Associates, LLC, subsequently purchased…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Seh Ahn Lee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Canvs Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Jonathan L. Kaplan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Columbia Venture, LLC v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- Filler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.