Legal Opinion

Stueve Bros. Farms, LLC v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 11, 2013No. 19-1590PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

This takings case requires us to decide whether the government’s actions effected a physical taking of a flowage easement over the plaintiffs’ property, even though the government never occupied the property by flooding. The Court of Federal Claims held that the government’s conduct did not constitute a taking. We affirm.

I

In 1941, the United States Army Corps of Engineers completed construction of the Prado Dam on the Santa Ana River near Corona, California. Predecessors of plaintiffs Stueve Bros. Farms, LLC, and Mill-creek Farming Associates, LLC, subsequently purchased…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Seh Ahn Lee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Canvs Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Jonathan L. Kaplan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Columbia Venture, LLC v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  5. Filler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API