Legal Opinion

G. V. B. Min. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Hailey

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1899No. 507PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of the United States for the District, of Idaho.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWLEY, District Judge.

Pending the foreclosure suit of G. V. B. Min. Co. v. First Nat. Bank, 95 Fed. 23, a receiver was appointed by the court to take charge of the proceeds of ore from the Red Elephant group of mines, then operated by Henry Aplington under a lease from the mining company. The amount of money from the proceeds of the ore thus extracted that came into the hands of the receiver was $7,617.34. Arthur Brown and Henry Aplington have each separately intervened in the suit of foreclosure, and claim the money realized from the proceeds of the ore thus extracted. Brown claims all of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lamar's Ex'or v. HaleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  2. Duryea v. BurtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Kahn v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Bissell v. FossSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Manville v. ParksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Munsey v. Mills & GarittyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Hatten v. Interocean Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Sturm v. UlrichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Bentley v. BrossardUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Cascaden v. DunbarDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API