Manville v. Parks
Supreme Court of Colorado
i Error to County Court of Lake County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The plaintiff Manville sued the defendants to recover the price of certain goods sold and delivered, for which the complaint alleged a joint and several promise to pay on the part of defendants. Two of the defendants, Parks and Yates, answered on their own behalf, denying the sale and delivery to them, and denying any promise to pay by them or either of them. The defendant Smith filed a separate answer, denying the sale and delivery, and denying a promise to pay by all or any of the defendants of the sum alleged to be due. The other two defendants, Bush and Henderson, filed no answer.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winship v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Duryea v. BurtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Drake v. DuvenickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Dougherty v. CrearyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Burgan v. LyellMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Munsey v. Mills & GarittyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Doyle v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Childers v. NeelyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hefferlin v. KarlmanMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- Meagher v. ReedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.