Hatten v. Interocean Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an appeal from an adverse judgment in an action for an accounting by plaintiff in error against defendants in error.
The parties are in the same relation as in the trial court. Por convenience the plaintiff corporation will be referred to herein as TJ. S. Cities and Roy I-Iatten, as receiver, will be referred to as the receiver. The defendant corporation will be referred to as Interocean and British American, respectively.
The matters involved include certain transactions with a corporation, not made a party, known as the Lorraine Petroleum Company, which will be referred to herein as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Duryea v. BurtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Betts v. LetcherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
- Dellapiazza v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Harrison v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Reinhart & Donovan Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Susi v. Mailath (In Re Mailath)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1989
- Simich v. CuljakWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Chancellor v. ChancellorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.