Bentley v. Brossard
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Cache County; J. H. Howell, Presiding Judge. Action by W. H. Bentley against A. Brossard and others. Prom a judgment for a part of defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.
This action was brought to recover the sum of $212 alleged to he due plaintiff from the defendants for labor performed on certain mining claims operated by the defendants. It is alleged in the complaint that the defendants entered into a contract in writing whereby they associated themselves together as copartners for the purpose of developing, improving and operating certain mining claims, naming them, known as the “Wakefield Group' of Mines,” situate near Tuscarora, Nevada, and for the purpose of extracting ore therefrom; that *399the defendants entered upon the work of developing and operating…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Duryea v. BurtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Kahn v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Manville v. ParksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- Settembre v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Munsey v. Mills & GarittyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Ellsworth Paulsen Construction Co. v. 51-SPR-L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
- Mud Control Laboratories v. CoveyUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. Bokum Resources Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1983
- Gilbert v. FontaineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.