In Re Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLIS, District Judge.
Like rumors of Mark Twain’s death, statements that the last chapter in this saga had been written were (lamentably) premature. Statements of this sort appeared in In re Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C., 864 F.Supp. 527 (E.D.Va.1994) (hereinafter Moffitt II), 1 which held, inter alia, that 21 U.S.C. § 853 requires a party who received forfeitable property from a criminal defendant, but who then transferred or dissipated the property prior to the entry of a restraining or forfeiture order, to forfeit property traceable to the transferred property. ■ Id.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Banco Cafetero Panama, Banco Cafetero Colon, Defendants-In-Rem-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Jerry A. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. U.S. Currency, $81,000.00Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Richard J. Lester, and Sheila Lester, Petitioner-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Old Republic National Title Insurance v. Tyler (In Re Dameron)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.