Legal Opinion

United States v. Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1996No. 95-1884, 95-1916PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge MICHAEL joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge:

In this appeal, we are asked to resolve important questions about the operation and preemptive effect of the Comprehensive Forfeiture Act of 1984(CFA). 21 U.S.C. § 853. These questions arise out of the government’s effort to forfeit, as the proceeds of criminal activity, a $103,800 legal fee paid to the law firm of Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler. The law firm and the government each allege…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Swiss American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Gary D. Bollin, United States of America v. Ernst N. Tietjen, United States of America v. James GormleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  3. KMK Factoring, L.L.C. v. McKnew (In Re McKnew)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
  4. United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
  5. United States v. Edison Misla-AldarondoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API