Whittier v. Home Sav. Bank of L.A.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff sued for something over six thousand dollars on a count for money had and received to his use and benefit. Judgment was given in his favor against the Bank of Los Angeles for $428.51. From this judgment he appeals.
The Tamped Oil Roads Company (a corporation) had entered into contracts to improve five streets in the city of Los Angeles known as Budlong Avenue, Griffin Avenue, Matthews Street, Scott Street, and Montana Street. Defendant S’. A. McCready had loaned to the corporation certain sums of money and had taken as security for such loans assignments of certain of the contracts…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Sivers v. SiversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Guidery v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Savings Bank v. AsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Bradford Investment Co. v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Greathouse v. DalenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Rotea v. IzuelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Ayers v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.