A.M.S. v. M.R.C.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
WECHT, J.:
This appeal requires us to identify the juncture in a custody relocation case at which a trial court must specify the reasons for its decision. We address this question under the current child custody law, which took effect in January 2011, as well as in the light shed by our recent decision in C.B. v. J.B. and M.B. and T.B., 2013 Pa.Super. 92, 65 A.3d 946.
In this case, M.R.C. [“Father”] appeals from the trial court’s August 6, 2012 order granting A.M.S. [“Mother”]’s request to relocate with the parties’ child, B.M.C. *831[“Child”] from Berks County, Pennsylvania to Palmyra,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- J.R.M. v. J.E.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- E.D. v. M.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Jones v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Wiernik v. PHH U.S. Mortgage Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- C.B. v. J.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- A.V. v. S.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- M.O. v. J.T.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- R.L.P. v. R.F.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- A.B. v. K.K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- A.F. and S.M. v. R.F. and S.F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.