M.O. v. J.T.R.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY WECHT, J.:
M.O. (“Mother”) appeals from the May 23, 2013 order that amended the parties’ February 12, 2013 child custody order following a hearing on J.T.R. (“Father”)’s petition for modification. The principal issue that we confront in this case is whether a trial court must address all sixteen factors enumerated in 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 5328 when the trial court decides a discrete and narrow issue ancillary to a materially unchallenged custody arrangement. We conclude that the trial court is not required to do so, and we affirm that court’s order.
A review of the record establishes the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- M.J.M. v. M.L.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- J.R.M. v. J.E.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- E.D. v. M.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- C.B. v. J.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- V.B. v. J.E.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- A.V. v. S.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- S.W.D. v. S.A.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- S.S. v. T.J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- T.D. v. E.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- A.W.-B. v. T.C.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.