Legal Opinion

M.O. v. J.T.R.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 2014PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY WECHT, J.:

M.O. (“Mother”) appeals from the May 23, 2013 order that amended the parties’ February 12, 2013 child custody order following a hearing on J.T.R. (“Father”)’s petition for modification. The principal issue that we confront in this case is whether a trial court must address all sixteen factors enumerated in 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 5328 when the trial court decides a discrete and narrow issue ancillary to a materially unchallenged custody arrangement. We conclude that the trial court is not required to do so, and we affirm that court’s order.

A review of the record establishes the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. M.J.M. v. M.L.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. J.R.M. v. J.E.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. E.D. v. M.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. C.B. v. J.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. V.B. v. J.E.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. A.V. v. S.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. S.W.D. v. S.A.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. S.S. v. T.J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. T.D. v. E.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. A.W.-B. v. T.C.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API