Legal Opinion
Pelletier v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 22, 1996No. 2 CA-CV 96-0244PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Presiding Judge.
The primary issue in this case is whether a seller whose contract is covered by and fails to comply with Arizona’s Home Solicitations and Referral Sales Act (the Act), A.R.S. §§ 44-5001 to 44-5008, may, under proper circumstances, recover equitable, restitutionary damages from the consumer/buyer based on unjust enrichment principles. Ruling in the affirmative, the trial court entered judgment for the seller and awarded it damages and attorney’s fees. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
We view the evidence and reasonable…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. PearsonArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- ASH, Inc. v. Mesa Unified School District No. 4Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Landi v. ArkulesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Rowland v. Great States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Johnson v. SwingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Jp Morgan v. MgmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Primoris Energy Services Corporation v. Air Products and Chemicals IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025