Legal Opinion
Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1985No. 17633-PRPublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Justice.
Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. (Murdock), a subcontractor, brought an action seeking recovery for fraud, breach of contract, and restitution against the prime contractor, Taylor Pearson, dba Taylor Pear son Construction Co. (Pearson). Murdock also joined Robert Wilbur and University Industries, Inc. (UI) as defendants, alleging they were joint venturers with Pearson. All defendants counterclaimed, seeking damages from Murdock for breach of contract.
The case was tried to a jury on the equitable theory of restitution. The jury found for Murdock and against all the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pyeatte v. PyeatteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Orin Osborn v. Boeing Airplane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- John A. Artukovich & Sons, Inc. v. Reliance Truck Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
3Cited by53 opinions
- Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Jeffs v. StubbsUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Mogavero v. SilversteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Ontiveros Insulation Co., Inc. v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- In re Relafen Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.