Worley v. Spreckels Bros. Commercial Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Harry L. Titus, James E. Wadham, and Clark A. Nichols, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been suffered by reason of the negligence of defendant. Plaintiff had verdict and judgment. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
There is no force in the objection made by plaintiff to a consideration of the defendant’s bill of exceptions.
Counsel for plaintiff is in error in his statement that the record does not show that an order has been made denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. It does contain a copy of the minute order to that effect, properly certified in his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Callan v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. CreeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Luman v. Golden Ancient Channel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. CollumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Guedon v. RooneyOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- King v. SchumacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Albert v. McKay & Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.