Albert v. McKay & Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. Clifton H. Conniek, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
For some years prior to March 10, 1913, Frank H. Albert had been in the employ of the defendant, McKay & Co., a corporation owning and operating a lumber-mill at Eureka, in Humboldt County. On the day named, Albert’s clothing was caught in an appliance attached to one of the shafts used in the transmission of power for the mill machinery, his body was drawn against the rapidly revolving shaft, and he received injuries which caused his death. He was survived by a widow and a minor child. This action was brought by the widow, as administratrix of his estate, to recover damages for the alleged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Callan v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Kennedy v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Worley v. Spreckels Bros. Commercial Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Keyes v. Geary St., Park, & Ocean R.R.California Supreme Court · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. BeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Kaplan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.