Luman v. Golden Ancient Channel Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries to plaintiff, alleged to have been suffered by him by reason of the negligence of defendant, while he was in its employ. The action was tried by the court without a jury, and the findings and judgment were given in defendant’s favor. 'Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The defendant, a mining company, was engaged in sinking. a vertical shaft on its property, which, on July 22, 1899, had reached a depth of more than two hundred feet. On that day plaintiff was at work in said shaft,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Donnelly v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Borland v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Lissak v. Crocker Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Estate of GleasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Willard v. Valley Gas & Fuel Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Inyo Chemical Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.