Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. McMan Oil & Gas Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1926No. 55. [fn*]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PANNILL, O. J.

At a former day of this term, judgment in this case was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. Defendants in error have filed a vigorous motion for rehearing, which we think must be sustained for the reasons hereinafter stated. The sustaining of this motion renders miich that was said in the original opinion immaterial, and it is therefore withdrawn and the following substituted:

Plaintiffs sued to recover the value of gasoline manufactured from casinghead gas produced from certain leases executed by them to W. T. Garrett and assigned to defendants. The recovery was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. The Texas Company v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Deaton v. RushTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. PriceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. McMan Oil & Gas Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Brownwood v. Texas Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Harris v. Lone Star Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Zephyr Oil Co. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Connellee v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API