Legal Opinion

Zephyr Oil Co. v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1954No. 15479PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

Joe P. Cunningham, as plaintiff, brought suit against Zephyr Oil Company to construe and enforce an assignment of ah oil and gas lease in which he was the grantor, in the alternative suing for reformation of such assignment and for its enforcement as reformed. The enforcement sought was against the grantee for a proportion of such defendant’s collection of money for gas marketed from the leased property. The trial court reformed the contract and rendered judgment for plaintiff for a proportion of such gas payments on the theory that title to such proportion of the gas…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. McMan Oil & Gas Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Reynolds v. McMan Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Financial Services, Inc. v. Practice Place, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Clarence Keese, Appants v. Continental Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. Destec Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Freestone Central Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Union Bank of California, N.A. (In Re Cornerstone E & P Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
  5. Doyle Wells, Sea Oats Investments I, L.P. F/K/A Lamkin Properties Limited Partnership and Quixote Dunes, Inc. v. Texas Department of Transportation, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API