Legal Opinion

The Texas Company v. Davis

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1923No. 3679PublishedCited by 155 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

Defendants in error sued plaintiffs in error to recover the oil, gas, and other minerals, with appurtenant surface rights, in 76-1/2 acres of the Josiah H. Bell league of land near West Columbia in Brazoria Connty, subject to royalties. Plaintiffs in error filed answers containing pleas of not guilty and special pleas, and also filed a cross-action seeking cancellation of the instruments under which defendants in error claimed. Defendants in error plead limitation of four years in bar of the cross-action.

The District Court rendered judgment for plaintiffs in error, in the suit against them…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Grubb v. McAfeeTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Miner v. . BeekmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Benavides v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1891

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by155 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Sullivan v. BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1971

150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API