Legal Opinion
Deaton v. Rush
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1923No. 3585PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge HAMILTON
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.
In this case, omitting immaterial portions of the certificate, questions are certified to the Supreme Court as follows:
“The above entitled cause is now pending in this court upon a motion for rehearing. The suit was instituted in the district court of Stephens County by the appellants, F. C. Deaton and wife, Annie Deaton, against J. M. Rush and the Magnolia Petroleum Company, claiming a mineral interest, to cancel a .conveyance of two several tracts of land in Stephens County, aggregating 286 acres, alleged to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Thomson v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- National Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. TeelTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Rosenborough v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1917
- Port Arthur Rice Milling Co. v. Beaumont Rice MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. SnyderTexas Supreme Court · 1886
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Nobles v. MarcusTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Binford v. SnyderTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Robert F. Ford, Jr. v. Exxon Mobil Chemical Company, a Division of Exxonmobil CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Caruthers v. LeonardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Hamilton v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.