Legal Opinion
Bradford v. Donovan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 1982No. 81-7836PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, Senior District Judge:
The petitioners, displaced employees of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad, applied for benefits under Title II of the Redwood National Park Expansion Act of 1978, Pub.L. No. 95-250, §§ 201-213, 92 Stat. 163, 172-82. Title II provides unemployment and severance pay for forest product workers displaced by expansion of the Redwood National Park.1 The Secretary of Labor denied petitioners benefits under the Act because he found they were not employees of an “affected employer” within the meaning of Section 201(9) of Title II, 92 Stat. 173.
We note jurisdiction under 16…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- William F. Lanning v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Ashcom v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by8 opinions
- Darrell Barnes, and J.J. Schroeder v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Albert J. Hoehn v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Barbara A. Barker v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Bennett v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Peter A. Martin v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.