Legal Opinion

Peter A. Martin v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1984No. 83-7066PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

Peter Martin was discharged for intoxication on the job by Areata Redwood Company, an “affected employer” under Title II of the Redwood National Park Expansion Act of 1978, Pub.L. No. 95-250, §§ 201-213, 92 Stat. 163, 172-82; 1 see id. § 201(6). He now seeks benefits under the Redwood Act.

A discharge, even for cause, may qualify an employee for benefits under § 201(12) of the Redwood Act, which defines “total layoff” as “a calendar week during which affected employers have made no work available to a covered employee.” Martin argues that an employer “makes no work…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sylvester TIPLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E. I. duPONT deNEMOURS AND CO., Inc., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  2. Lloyd Thompson v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Drapich v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Bradford v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Viola E. Egbert v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frontier Enterprises, Inc. v. Amador Stage Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API