Legal Opinion

Ashcom v. Donovan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1982No. Nos. 81-7182, 81-7587PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

Employees of Wayne Bare Trucking Company appeal from the Secretary of Labor’s determination that they do not qualify for benefits under the Redwood National Park Expansion Act, Pub.L.No. 95-250, 92 Stat. 163 (1978).** The Act increased the size of the Park and provided economic assistance to employees displaced by the expansion. Lanning v. Marshall, 650 F.2d 1055, 1056 (9th Cir. 1981). However, not every employee suffering loss is entitled to benefits.

One prerequisite is that his employer must have been affected by the expansion. The Act specifies three types of qualifying…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William F. Lanning v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Don S. Noble v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bradford v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Rains v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Danny W. Tuey, and Leslie A. Dehaven v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, Donald L. Scott, William G. Gillespie, Archie T. Lawrence v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re the Petition of Lloyd E. Ashcom v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, in Re the Petition of Merel E. Babcock v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Tuey v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API