Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Donovan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1984No. 82-7730PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Petitioners seek review of decisions by the Assistant Secretary of Labor denying them the weekly layoff benefits that are available to displaced lumber industry workers under Title II of the Redwood National Park Expansion Act (Redwood Act), Pub.L. No. 95-250, 92 Stat. 163 (1978).1 We hold that the petitioners are eligible for the benefits and reverse the Assistant Secretary’s decisions. In doing so, we reject his conclusion that petitioners’ employer was not engaged in “wood processing operations.”

Prior to the expansion of Redwood National Park, the five individual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. William F. Lanning v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Emma L. David v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Albert J. Hoehn v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Bradford v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bennett v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API