Legal Opinion

William F. Lanning v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 13, 1981No. 80-7020PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POOLE, Circuit Judge:

William F. Lanning appeals a determination by the Secretary of Labor denying weekly layoff benefits available to displaced forest industry workers under the Redwood National Park Expansion Act of 1978 (Redwood Act) 16 U.S.C. § 79b. 1 The decision followed a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge of the California Unemployment Insurance Board. The Secretary of Labor ruled that at the time appellant was rendered an “affected employee” by partial layoff as he had less than the five years of creditable service required to be eligible for full benefits under the Act. We…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. International Woodworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 3-98 v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, and California Employment Development DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Brooks v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. International Woodworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 3-98 v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, and California Employment Development DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Emma L. David v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Blackfeet Indian Tribe v. Montana Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API