Legal Opinion

Steven Manning v. Gary Miller, Federal Bureau of Investigation Agent, and Robert Buchan, Federal Bureau of Investigation Agent

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 21, 2004No. 03-1762PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

This case raises the question of how far immunity extends for Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents accused of “framing” a defendant. Steven Manning was tried and convicted for kidnaping and murder; he later had those convictions overturned. Manning now brings suit against, among others, the FBI agents involved in his investigation. The FBI agents, Buchan and Miller, moved for summary judgment based on their absolute and qualified immunity from the charges. The district court denied these motions. Buchan and Miller bring these interlocutory appeals. For the reasons…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Daniel Engel v. Robert BuchanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Montoya v. VigilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. Manning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Engel v. DormireSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  5. Lana Canen v. Dennis ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API