Legal Opinion

Cox v. Palos Verdes Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1916No. L. A. No. 4684. In BankPublishedCited by 2 opinions

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Grant Jackson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

Motion to dismiss appeal from the judgment for failure to file transcript within the time prescribed by the rules of this court.

The appeal herein was taken July 23, 1915, and the time for filing a transcript has long since expired, unless there is pending in the superior court a proceeding for the settlement of a bill of exceptions or statement which may be used in support of the appeal. (Rule 2.) The certificate of the clerk of said court on which the motion is based does not show the fact in regard to this, but said certificate, when taken in connection with certain affidavits filed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Haviland v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Cameron v. Arcata & Mad River RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Cole v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Baily v. KreutzmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rath v. VaughanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Kerrigan v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API