Baily v. Kreutzmann
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendant is a physician and surgeon, and as such he examined the plaintiff Hannah M. Baily, and pronounced her ailment to he a cystic tumor of the ovary, and ordered her to a hospital, where he proceeded to operate upon her for the said ailment. After an abdominal incision and careful inspection of the parts, he discovered that the ovaries were in reasonably good condition, and, finding the uterus enlarged, concluded that the patient was probably pregnant, and sewed up the incision. The wound healed, and subsequent events proved that she was not pregnant at the time of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Gallagher v. Market Street Railway Co. of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Lilley v. ParkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Brown v. ColmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Gluckstein v. LipsettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. OdomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.