Rath v. Vaughan
California Court of Appeal
MOTION to dismiss an appeal. Granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
On motion to dismiss appeal in an unlawful detainer action, on the ground that the transcript has not been 'filed within the time allowed by law. Notice of this motion was served and filed on September 10, 1919. Rule II prescribes, as the general rule, that the printed transcript shall be filed within forty days after the appeal was perfected. But “if a proceeding for settlement of a bill of exceptions ■ which may be used in support of such appeal is pending or may still be instituted, the time aforesaid shall not begin to run until the settled and authenticated bill of exceptions has been…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cox v. Palos Verdes Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Canon Reliance Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Lantz v. ValCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Short v. KerrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
- Kerrigan v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921