Haas v. C. B. Cones & Son Manufacturing Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom the Tipton Circuit Court. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.
—Suit by appellee to recover the price of goods sold. Upon issues formed a trial by jury resulted in a verdict for appellee. Overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial is assigned as error.
The first cause for a new trial discussed is the refusal of the court to permit the introduction in evidence of the affidavit of the publisher of a newspaper at Worthington, Ind., that a certain notice attached to the affidavit was published. This notice was to the effect that the business conducted render the firm name of M. Haas at Worthington, Ind., was that day sold to Morris Haas, who was authorized…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- City of Indianapolis v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. SmockIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Du Souchet v. DutcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Tracy v. HacketIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Eckman v. FunderburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Roper v. Cannel City Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Shelby Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- McKaig v. JordanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.