Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. Smock

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1893No. 15,925PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, C. J.

This was an action in the court below to recover damages for the burning of an ice-house alleged to have been ignited by sparks from one of the locomotive *412engines of the appellant. The court overruled a demurrer interposed to the complaint by the appellant, and to this ruling it reserved an exception.

There was a trial by a jury, resulting in a verdict for the appellees, upon which the court, over a motion for a new trial, rendered judgment. With the general verdict, the jury returned answers to special interrogatories. The appellant moved the court to require the jury to answer more fully…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railway Co. v. BurgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. OstranderIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Lockwood v. RoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Laudeman v. Russell & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Indianapolis & Northwestern Traction Co. v. HendersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Shenk v. StahlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Haas v. C. B. Cones & Son Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. McAfee v. MontgomeryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API