Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Yellowley
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 10, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBEDD, District Judge.
This is an action in equity, and the plaintiff in his complaint prays for judgment that the defendant shall forthwith restore and return to the plaintiff, at his place of business, nine cases of goods therein described. The goods in question consist of cases of pints of whisky.
The plaintiff was a retail druggist and the holder of a permit to dispense liquor on prescription under the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305). The plaintiff had also received authority to purchase liquor in an amount greater than the quantity seized. On the day before the seizure a police…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lipke v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Francis Drug Co. v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1921
- Heaton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- In re AlpernDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1922
- Massachusetts v. BoganDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Louis Sager Hunsucker, Jr. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Eastus v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Goodman v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Cabitt v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923
- Louis Sager Hunsucker, Jr. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974