Legal Opinion
Eastus v. Bradshaw
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1938No. 8550PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
Upon a formal bill in equity brought in the District Court for the Northern District of Texas by Leo Bradshaw against Clyde O. Eastus as United States Attorney and Arthur Harvey as a special agent of the United States Revenue Service a decree was obtained forever enjoining the respondents and all governmental agents and agencies from using as evidence in any criminal proceeding against the petitioner the sworn testimony, the writings, the state- merits, and memoranda which had been delivered by him to Harvey in certain income tax investigations, and suppressing them as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Dier v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Sims v. StuartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Stefanelli v. MinardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Louis Sager Hunsucker, Jr. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Joseph W. Richey and Wife, Blanche Richey v. Jack E. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Luther F. Grant and Sirrka v. Grant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.