Legal Opinion

Cabitt v. Potter

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 31, 1923No. 2507PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

The petitioner did business as a druggist at 109 Green street, Boston, under the name of the “Canning Pharmacy.” He had a druggist’s permit under the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305). On August 23, 24, and 25, 1923, prohibition agents went to the store, and, on asking for a pair of shoes, were given on each occasion a pint of whisky, for which they paid $5.50. Live pints in all were thus purchased. Each bottle had on it a label, with the name of a person-and the name of a physician as prescribing the liquor. On August 25th, after the last sale, an employee named…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. United States v. BorkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goodman v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. United States v. SolomonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API