Cabitt v. Potter
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
LOWELL, District Judge.
The petitioner did business as a druggist at 109 Green street, Boston, under the name of the “Canning Pharmacy.” He had a druggist’s permit under the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305). On August 23, 24, and 25, 1923, prohibition agents went to the store, and, on asking for a pair of shoes, were given on each occasion a pint of whisky, for which they paid $5.50. Live pints in all were thus purchased. Each bottle had on it a label, with the name of a person-and the name of a physician as prescribing the liquor. On August 25th, after the last sale, an employee named…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. BorkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goodman v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. SolomonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1929