Legal Opinion

In re Alpern

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 3, 1922PublishedCited by 11 opinions

At Law. In the matter of application of Julius Alpern and David K. Gritz, partners doing business as the Alpcrn-Gritz Drug Company, for an order directing return of certain intoxicating liquors, canceled physicians’ prescriptions, and internal revenue record book, seized under a search warrant.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This is a petition for the return of a quantity of intoxicating liquor in bottles, an internal revenue book, and physicians’ prescriptions in the possession of the petitioners, seized under a search warrant pursuant to the provisions of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305). The petitioner Gritz conceded^ is a licensed druggist, engaged in partnership with one Alpern in business at Buffalo under the firm name of Alpern-Gritz Drug Company. The petition, which is not controverted, shows that on October 24, 1921, in accordance with law, the petitioners in .their firm…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States v. MarescaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  3. United States v. AllredSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Francis Drug Co. v. PotterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1921

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Steckler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. United States v. CasinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
  3. United States v. MusgraveDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1923
  4. Mellet & Nichter Brewing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Friedman v. YellowleyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API