Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Holt

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided April 11, 1989No. ACM S27903 (f rev)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The facts before us are simple but sad. The appellant is a retirement eligible non-commissioned officer who pleaded guilty to possessing “crack” cocaine * at various times between 1 August 1987 and 11 January 1988. He was sentenced by members to a bad conduct discharge and reduction to airman basic. The convening authority approved the punishment as announced. Appellate defense counsel argue that a bad conduct discharge is inappropriate in view of the appellant’s lengthy service and the effect such a punishment will have on his family.

There can…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. TrottierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  3. Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. HeywardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. HawkinsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. ToroU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. SloanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. BranoffU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. SmithU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API