Legal Opinion

Murray v. Haldeman

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 25, 1983No. Misc. Dkt. No. 83-20PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

Petitioner applied to our Court for an extraordinary writ to prohibit his prosecution by the Navy on a charge that he “did in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania area, on or between 5 June 1982 and 6 July 1982, wrongfully use marihuana,” in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The charge resulted from the testing of a urine specimen which Murray was compelled to provide upon reporting on July 6, 1982, to a school at the Philadelphia Naval Base.

After the charge had been referred for trial by special court-martial, a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. United States v. HarperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. BallardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. FordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. Robert A. Walters v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. BickelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API