Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Toro

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided December 19, 1991No. ACM 28653PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JAMES, Judge:

Convicted of divers drug offenses,1 appellant assigns numerous errors that can be categorized as claims of error at trial, a complementary claim that the trial defense counsel’s assistance was ineffective, a claim that the sentence is too severe, and a final claim relating to the lack of terms of tenure for the service of military judges and appellate military judges. We also address appellant’s interlocutory motion for release from confinement pending appeal. We find no errors requiring relief, and we affirm the conviction and sentence.

Appellant assigned six…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. ToroUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. BranoffU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. MosleyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. BellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. ThornU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API