Bush v. Mattingly
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLaPRADE, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court granting’ defendant’s motion for a new trial. The appellant, plaintiff below, was successful in securing a verdict and judgment in the lower court. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court — plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiff was a real estate salesman employed in the office of the defendant, who was a real estate broker. Plaintiff in his complaint alleged that he had earned certain commissions as a salesman for the defendant, which the defendant denied. The complaint, among other things, alleges that it was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gorham v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hall v. RankinArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Eads v. MurphyArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Jones v. KehoeWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Orr v. Perky Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Dura v. Walker, Hart & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Armijo v. National Surety Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Nutter v. BechtelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- ABI, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.