Legal Opinion

Eads v. Murphy

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1925No. Civil No. 2161PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— This is an action on a note and to foreclose the mortgage securing the same. The complaint is in the usual form.

Defendants answered admitting the execution of the note and the mortgage, hut setting up payment therefor, alleging that defendant Henry L. Eads was associated in the real estate business with plaintiff with the express agreement that the former was to receive certain commissions on the sale of real estate; that he had in this manner earned various sums, a part of which had been paid to him, and the balance, it was agreed by plaintiff, should be credited on the note. That,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hoge v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Roberts v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Bartlett Estate Co. v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. Thompson v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Berne v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. Johnson v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. Summers v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Ellingson v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Turley v. EthingtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API