Legal Opinion

ABI, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1984No. Civ. 69071PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AUERBACH, J. *

ABI Inc. (ABI), a land developer, filed an action against defendants City of Los Angeles and Crocker National Bank (sometimes collectively denominated City) seeking to recover approximately $38,000 in fees out of a total sum of $57,000 deposited with the defendants as a condition for participating in the City’s 1980 Home Mortgage Revenue Bond Program. ABI’s complaint was couched in four causes of action. The first cause of action petitioned for a writ of mandate, while the second cause of action complained of breach of contract. The remaining causes sounded in unjust…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Californians for Population Stabilization v. Hewlett-Packard Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Riley v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. McGuire v. More-Gas Invistment, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Northridge Hospital Foundation v. Pic 'N' Save No. 9, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. El Centro Mall, LLC v. Payless ShoeSource, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API