Gorham v. Heiman
California Supreme Court
Separate appeals from part of a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from the whole judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
J.— This is a suit in equity arising out of a controversy between several opposing claimants to a sum of money in the hands of the London and San Francisco Bank. There are two appeals in the case, the first, No. 12958, being an appeal by plaintiffs from a part of the judgment in favor of the interveners, and the second, No. 13333, being an appeal by the defendants Heiman and Hamilton from the whole judgment, which was in favor of the plaintiffs and the interveners. The two appeals have been argued and submitted, and may be conveniently considered together.
The controversy arose upon the…
2Cited by39 opinions
- Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- Hellings v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Dura v. Walker, Hart & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Holland v. Morgan & Peacock Properties Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Aldis v. SchleicherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.