Legal Opinion

Hall v. Rankin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1920No. Civil No. 1806PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Yavapai. John J. Sweeney, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Action of assumpsit for work and labor done and performed by the plaintiff for the defendant, at his special instance and request, in and *14about “the examination, investigation and sale of certain mining properties.” The plaintiff offered oral testimony tending to prove that tbe Henrietta mine belonged to tbe Braganza Mines Company, tbe defendant owning sixty-five per cent of tbe capital stock of tbe company; that tbe defendant approached the plaintiff and said to him substantially:

“I have been trying to sell the Henrietta mine to the Big Ledge people, but the mine must stand the inspection of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Rose v. HaydenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. Gorham v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Carr v. LeavittMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Aldis v. SchleicherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shattuck v. Precision-Toyota, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Condon v. Arizona Housing CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bush v. MattinglyArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Knight v. ChamberlainUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Garner v. Arizona Egyptian Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API