Legal Opinion

Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 1966No. 111PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

This appeal presents the question of law whether the plaintiff offered evidence sufficient to permit the jury to find (1) the defendant was guilty of the act of negligence alleged in the complaint; and, if so, (2) whether such act proximately caused the plaintiff’s injury. In such cases the evidence is sufficient if, upon its fair and reasonable consideration, it permits the jury to make the required findings. Davis v. Parnell, 260 N.C. 622, 133 S.E. 2d 169; Griffin v. Blankenship, 248 N.C. 81, 102 S.E. 2d 451. The proof may be by evidence, direct, circumstantial, or a combination of both.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Farmer Ex Rel. Farmer v. FerrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. . CohoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Mattingly v. NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Oberlin Capital, L.P. v. SlavinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Cobb v. Pennsylvania Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Hull v. OldhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Lee v. Paragon Group Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Dunning Ex Rel. Sowers v. Forsyth Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API