Legal Opinion
State v. Tilley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 15, 1954No. 722PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
79 S.E.2d 473 (1954)
239 N.C. 245
STATE
v.
TILLEY et al.
No. 722.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
January 15, 1954.
Atty. Gen. Harry McMullan, Asst. Attys. Gen. Ralph Moody and Love, and Robert L. Emanuel, Raleigh, Member of the Attorney-General's Staff, for the State, appellee.
Higgins & McMichael and H. Bryce Parker, Winston-Salem, for defendant D. W. Snow, appellant.
ERVIN, Justice.
The defendant insists primarily that he is entitled to a reversal for insufficiency of testimony. This claim is insupportable. The evidence of the State's witness Tilley was amply sufficient to carry the case to the jury…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Helms v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . HaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
- Matheny v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- McDonald v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Worth Co. v. International Sugar Feed No. 2 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. CareySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.