Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Nyitray v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1983No. 82-247PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

This cause presents the issue of whether a writ of mandamus was properly denied in which the widow-appellant seeks an order that the Industrial Commission pay her the temporary total disability compensation that her husband was entitled to receive, had applied for and had been granted, but had not received at the time of his death. We conclude that the writ was improperly denied for the following reasons.

Under Ohio’s workers’ compensation law, there are two separate and distinct types of compensation available to dependents of deceased workers. Dependents may be awarded the compensation the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Industrial Commission v. KamrathOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Porter v. City of OberlinOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Kinney v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Schwan v. Riverside Methodist HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Doersam v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API